http://www.kubrick2001.com/ - The space odyssey explained
de még az egészhez hozzá kell fûzni azt, hogy mindenkinek mást jelent az egész, így nincs egyértelmû magyarázat semmire...
Plusz még azt is hozzá kell tenni, hogy a következõt maga Stanley Kubrick nyilatkozta egy 1968-as interjúban:
It’s not a message I ever intended to convey in words. 2001 is a nonverbal experience; out of two hours and 19 minutes of film, there are only a little less than 40 minutes of dialog. I tried to create a visual experience, one that bypasses verbalized pigeonholing and directly penetrates the subconscious with an emotional and philosophic content. To convolute McLuhan, in 2001 the message is the medium. I intended the film to be an intensely subjective experience that reaches the viewer at an inner level of consciousness, just as music does; to “explain” a Beethoven symphony would be to emasculate it by erecting an artificial barrier between conception and appreciation. You’re free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film – and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level – but I don’t want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he’s missed the point. How much would we appreciate La Gioconda today if Leonardo had written at the bottom of the canvas: “This lady is smiling slightly because she has rotten teeth” – or “because she’s hiding a secret from her lover”? It would shut off the viewer’s appreciation and shackle him to a “reality” other than his own. I don’t want that to happen to 2001.
Persze azért mindenki leírja a véleményét, meg az elgondolását és ez így van jól, de szerintem nincs egyértelmû értelmezés. Mivel mindenkinek más egy kicsit... és ez a szép az egészbe