Te azon emberek koze tartozol, akik ugy gondoljak, hogy ha sokszor kimondanak egy hulyeseget, akkor az attol igazza valik... rossz hirem van...
Mennyiben, te barom? Miért hazudsz már megint?
Peldaul adocsalas felemlegetese... abszolut nem volt relevans, de te az Apple-t tamadando es a Samsungot vedendo felhoztad.
a Samsung felkínálta a segítségét, te meg azt írtad, hogy nem.
Ja, mintha Escobarnak mondtak volna azt, hogy irjon tanulmanyt a kokain karos hatasarol... erre a mondta a biro a rokas hasonlatot...
De amugy ennyire akart segiteni a Samsung: "But Samsung has been uncooperative so far. According to the order "Samsung has elected not to provide the court with any sworn testimony from Dr. Ahn or anyone else at the meeting" and "also has failed to supply the court with any evidence at all regarding other uses of the Apple-Nokia license, or those of the other confidential licenses". [...] After three months, Samsung still doesn't answer some very basic questions."
Szerintem te fel sem fogod, hogy ez egy mennyire komoly ugy.
"The transcript confirms that there's "an analogous issue involving different information, overlapping but different information, at the ITC". [...] So there could be sanctions in federal court, sanctions by the ITC, possibly sanctions in non-U.S. courts in which material was used against the rules. This is a mess." - http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/10/apple-lawyer-on-samsung-scandal-im-old.html