Lehet, de ahogy nezem a vilag all egyre inkabb a feje tetejere, legalabbis az emberi ertekeket tekintve. Sok, nallam bolcsebb emberrel szemben en akkor is hozzaszolok egy temahoz ha az nem tisztan elmeleti es tudomanyos, ezert nem csak abszolut ervenyu es erteku hozzaszolasaim vannak.
A wikipedia idevago resze:
"Child euthanasia is a controversial form of non-voluntary euthanasia that is applied to children who are gravely ill or suffer from significant birth defects.
Eric Kodish and Daniel A Beals, have compared child euthanasia to infanticide. Kodish says "the very notion that there is an “accepted medical standard” for infanticide calls for resistance in the form of civil disobedience". Others, such as Joseph Fletcher, founder of situational ethics and a euthanasia proponent, proposed that infanticide be permitted in cases of severe birth defects. Fletcher says that unlike the sort of infanticide perpetrated by very disturbed people, in such cases child euthanasia could be considered humane; a logical and acceptable extension of abortion. American bioethicist Jacob M. Appel goes one step further, arguing that pediatric euthanasia may be ethical even in the absence of parental consent. Biothicists Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that killing a newborn "should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled"."
Ebbol az utolso mondat a leginkabb problemas: "egy ujszulott megolese megengedett kell hogy legyen minden esetben ahol az abortusz is az, beleertve azokat ahol az ujszulott nem serult"
Legalabb kimondtak, de akkor sem tudok egyeterteni vele, viszont a torvenyek valamiert erre haladnak...