Atombomba hatásfokáról tanultál? Melyik egyetemen?
Az a szerencsétlen John Doe, egy helyen dolgozott Ede bácsival. (Teller Ede) Los Alamosban. (valami köze van a bombához, ott állt egy modell mellett, valahogy innen nézve, te tûnsz Kovács 45. Jánosnak. LOL. Ha atomfizikus vagy, akkor valamit mutass már róla.
I'm trying to compare energy released..Isn't that a bit like asking "Which is heavier, a ton of lead or a ton of feather?". The energy output of a GT explosion will be the same, no matter what the mechanism which produces the explosion. The difference is the mass of material before hand. You'd need a billion tons of TNT if it's chemical or ~23kg of antimatter.
You know from your calculations that you need about 46kg of mass to turn into energy, so find out what percentage of U235 turns into energy when it goes supercritical and then you can work out how much total U235 you'd need.
For instance, if it's 1%, then you'd need 100*23kg. If it's 0.5%, 200*23kg. Etc
DaveFaz
Mar3-07, 02:25 PM
Interestingly, in parctical terms, it would require a huge amount of Uranium. The high figure is because Atomic bombs are not very efficient. In the first atomic bomb which had more than 50Kg of Uranium, only 0.7g was converted to energy. So a 50Kg Uranium bomb releases the same energy as a 3.5g anti-matter bomb. So one answer would be around 14,000 times as much Uranium as anti-matter. Course, that was not really the question you asked, but there you go...
De azért szép, hogy aggódsz, hátha még ennyit sem tud pontosan egy Bob Lazar szerû figura. (vagy az zavar, hogy hol dolgozott? -Area51-S4-
Arról nem tehet senki, vagy elfogadod, vagy nem, ez sem õt nem érdekli, sem engem. É csak a látványos példa miatt tettem be.)